-
Website
http://confident1.com/ -
Original page
http://confident1.com/myth-of-the-addictive-personality -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
assurance
1 comment · 1 points
-
david365
5 comments · 1 points
-
evanhadkins
1 comment · 3 points
-
dwatson425
1 comment · 1 points
-
kencook
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Let it be You – Tribute to Jim Rohn
2 weeks ago · 1 comment
-
Let it be You – Tribute to Jim Rohn
It seem that low self esteem is related to behaviors that cause social problem widely.
Do you have any reseach on how to build up self esteem?
<abbr></abbr><abbr>nassorns last blog post..What is your purpose in life.</abbr>
<abbr></abbr><abbr>Lance Nelsons last blog post..You Don’t have to be Rich to own Overseas Property</abbr>
Unfortunately, a lot of research I've read in this area says that you can bolster false self-esteem, but that genuine self-esteem is something that the individual has to develop on his or her own. Perhaps cognitive-behavioral therapy might be useful in developing genuine self-esteem, but the typical, non-clinical interventions you come across (such as friends telling you how much you rock) only serve to increase artificial self-esteem.
The difference between genuine and artificial self-esteem is that genuine self-esteem is stable and improves emotional resiliency, while artificial self-esteem is fragile and tends to lead to hostility in response to perceived self-esteem threats. It's the difference between honestly believing that you're an OK person, and being narcissistic.
On that note, here are the citations for a few articles I found on the subject - you should be able to find them at your local college library (hopefully my text formatting will work out):
Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J, D., Krueger, J. I., Vohs, K. D., DuBois, D. L., & Tevendale, H. D. (2007). Issue 5: Applying Social Psychology: Are Self-Esteem Programs Misguided? [i]Taking sides: Clashing views in social psychology, 2nd ed.[/i] J. A. Nier, Ed. New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill, 92-115.
Gailliot, M. T., & Baumeister, R. F. (2007). Self-esteem, belongingness, and worldview validation: Does belongingness exert a unique influence upon self-esteem? [i]Journal of Research in Personality, 41[/i](2), 327-345.
There's a huge body of literature on this subject. If you go to your local college's library and log into the PsychArticles or PsychINFO databases do a search for "self-esteem improvement" and "self-esteem improvement AND Baumeister" with Baumeister in the author field. You'll find tons of relevant info. Many of the results will have linked full-text articles you can download/print.
That means, I did do the research, however it did not fit into my hypothesis.
Thank you very much for your kindly respond with expand to value information.
Seamus - I can empathize, using alcohol to "enjoy" social occasions was a well established habit of mine. Whether its my age or the fact I seem to rarely find myself in social situations where alcohol is available, but seem to have moved on without consciously changing.
Personality disorders can reach as far as obsessing over anything, chemical, material, spiritual, maternal, physical, meta-physical, emotional and more. With this in mind how can such a statement hold any basis for any more than chatter? Mindless or otherwise it is unfair and discouraging for any sentient being to be told that it is simply "all in your head".
All that we are an will ever be is "in our heads and hearts". To be heartless for the point of scratching ones head is little more than mindless masturbation.
The second sentence disproves the first. If there is evidence that a person has genetic predisposition to addiction, then we would say he has a addictive personality.
I don't think you entirely comprehend the problem. It isn't difficult to quit an addiction through one's own will power. The difficulty is remaining sober despite one's own best efforts. What is required is a personality change so significant that relapse becomes near impossible. You can't change your personality until you understand that a change is required. Hence, the admission of having an addictive personality.
Do some people use that admission as an excuse to stay in addiction? Sure. Did they need an excuse? Not really. There is, however, a difference between a person who is drinking/using with or without that awareness. The latter has no way out: they are stuck in their predisposition. The former knows there is a way out, but chooses not to take it.
<abbr></abbr><abbr>Neds last blog post..Change I Need</abbr>
My take on it was that he was punishing women (I was not the 1st) for the other failures in his life and that if he called me by my name I became a real person with feelings that could be hurt, We met online and for weeks he called me by my screen name.At no time did he ever look at his own actions that caused or had effect on past relationships.
Please correct me if my interpretation of your post is incorrect. You mention Sigmund Freud and Mark Twain, and use the term "on the fence" and say that their attitudes are "... how anybody who does not suffer from the affliction or compulsion of addiction is able...to make such cruel statements."
Sigmund Freud was a profound addict. Regarding his own behavior using his own theory we can say that he was fixated in the oral and anal stage. He smoked 20 cigars a day for more than 50 years (and found it impossible to work without them). Ultimately he had to have his jaw removed due to cancer, but he still smoked! And he was compulsive (anal fixation) - he followed the same ritualized schedule pretty much every day.
[From Siegler, R., DeLoache, J., & Eisenberg, N. (2006). How children develop, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Worth Publishers, p. 339.]
"To cease smoking is the easiest thing I ever did. I ought to know because I did it a thousand times." ~ Mark Twain
Although Mark Twain took a rather cavalier attitude toward his addiction, he was in fact an addict. Who knows how he really felt about his niccotine addiction? He was a humorist, and tended to treat most subjects in a light-handed manner.
I agree that Freud and Twain's comments are insensitive, and can be especially hurtful to someone coping with an addiction [I'm not making assumptions about you, Glen, I'm speaking generally here :) ]. However, we cannot assume that just because someone speaks callously they do not understand what an addiction is like. In fact, to go back to Freud, it's possible that the people who suffer the most are going to be the ones who also speak the cruelest words. Reaction formation, the defense mechanism in which anxiety-producing thoughts or feelings are replaced with their exact opposites, can often lead people who should actually be empathetic to turn into ripe bastards.
<abbr></abbr><abbr>maia berenss last blog post..Why we all don’t have what we want</abbr>
<abbr></abbr><abbr>Daitondimenys last blog post..Pet Groomers ? How To Build Your Business Online</abbr>
I certainaly wouldn't recommend picking over your faults as you would at a scab. I think it just makes them worse.
If my problems can seem less after a good night's sleep, a good meal and a brisk walk, it suggests I can overcome them easily.
RESIST the urge to indulge yourself. Get out of the house, and do works of charity for strangers.